South America

Table of Contents
  1. South America
  2. Chile
  3. Argentina
  4. Other Countries of South America
  5. Review Quizzes

South America

Winemaking arrived in the New World with Spanish conquistadores in the 16th century.

From Mexico, where viticulture was first established in the Americas, the vine spread southward through other Spanish colonies, from Peru to Chile and Argentina by 1560. The Portuguese brought the vine to Brazil as early as 1532. Whether Spanish Catholics and missionaries hold responsibility for propagation of the vine, or colonists were simply interested in preserving a staple of their old lives, viticulture flourished in most of South America. However, despite promising early origins, South American viticulture suffered under a prohibitive 17th century Spanish law that restricted wine production (unrelated to the Church) in the New World in favor of Iberian producers. While some nascent wine-producing colonies were hindered by Spanish calls to uproot their vineyards, others, such as Chile, did their best to ignore the ban on production. The matter was settled definitively as the early 1800s brought a new era of political autonomy to former colonies, and Argentina, Chile, and Brazil (South America’s three leading wine producers) gained independence, though not without a great degree of turbulence and strife. An influx of European immigration in the 19th century, along with the development of a national rail system, resulted in a rapid expansion of viticulture in Argentina. Chile also benefited from European expertise: in 1830 the Frenchman Claudio Gay set up a Chilean repository of pre-phylloxera Vitis vinifera vines at the University of Chile’s Quinta Normal department. These vine specimens served Chile well; its geographic isolation, due to the Andes, prevented phylloxera from entering the country. Today, Chile is the only major winemaking country to remain totally phylloxera-free; in the late 1800s the country was able to capitalize on Europe’s vineyard devastation

Comments
Anonymous
Parents
  • How is Pedro Gimenez the most planted white grape in Argentina?  Is it for table wine or blending?  As a native of Argentina and a lover of our wine Torrontes is THE white grape in the country. Thank you!

  • What we think of as the Premier grapes of fine wine are rarely the most planted in any country (the big exception may be Cab Sauv in the US, but most of that still goes to bulk wines, not fine wines).

  • So I'll roll in the esoterica mud with you.

    It depends on how you slice it... Winesofargentina.org doesn't even list Pedro Gimenez but it DOES have "other whites" listed as being the prodominant stat @ over 15000 ha This aligns with Paola's Ire of the grape. Jancis's (im a fan of William Strunk) information on the grape is from 2013, and a lot can happen in 7 years... but it lists it's footprint at around 12000 ha, which is higher than all 3 variants of Torrontes (im not getting into the clone/biotype shenanigans that's a whole other mess). Remember this is also using 2013 figures for Pedro Gimenez and 2020 figures for Torrontes, et al. so I wouldn't put my signature on it. I'll dig around some more. Get in here and nerd around... 

  • I’m a little curious on this topic as well. The “Wines of Argentina” video feature seems to claim that the title of most planted white grape in Argentina belongs to Torrontes, which contradicts the information presented here... Can anyone help clarify?

Comment
  • I’m a little curious on this topic as well. The “Wines of Argentina” video feature seems to claim that the title of most planted white grape in Argentina belongs to Torrontes, which contradicts the information presented here... Can anyone help clarify?

Children
  • So I'll roll in the esoterica mud with you.

    It depends on how you slice it... Winesofargentina.org doesn't even list Pedro Gimenez but it DOES have "other whites" listed as being the prodominant stat @ over 15000 ha This aligns with Paola's Ire of the grape. Jancis's (im a fan of William Strunk) information on the grape is from 2013, and a lot can happen in 7 years... but it lists it's footprint at around 12000 ha, which is higher than all 3 variants of Torrontes (im not getting into the clone/biotype shenanigans that's a whole other mess). Remember this is also using 2013 figures for Pedro Gimenez and 2020 figures for Torrontes, et al. so I wouldn't put my signature on it. I'll dig around some more. Get in here and nerd around...