Champagne and Sparkling Wine

Table of Contents
  1. From Still to Sparkling Wine in Champagne
  2. Viticulture and Climate in Champagne
  3. The Regions of Champagne
  4. The CIVC and Échelle de Crus
  5. Types of Champagne Producers
  6. The Méthode Champenoise
  7. Styles of Champagne
  8. Still wines of Champagne
  9. Other Traditional Method Sparkling Wines
  10. Other Sparkling Winemaking Methods
  11. Review Quizzes

From Still to Sparkling Wine in Champagne

The techniques of sparkling winemaking did not originate with the Benedictine monk Dom Pérignon, nor was the first purposely sparkling wine produced in the region of Champagne. Regardless, through centuries of refinement Champagne has become the world’s leading sparkling wine and the vinous embodiment of luxury and celebration.

The méthode Champenoise, a complicated process involving secondary fermentation in the bottle, is at the heart of Champagne’s character and has been adopted by sparkling winemakers worldwide. The term, like “Champagne” itself, is protected by the EU, and may only be applied to sparkling wines produced according to the prescribed method within the Champagne AOP. Wines made in the fashion of Champagne but produced elsewhere may be labeled as traditional method (méthode traditionnelle) or classic method (méthode classique). Some producers, particularly in the US, continue to label their sparkling wines as Champagne, but such wines are banned from the EU.

Dom Pérignon’s lasting contributions to modern Champagne lie in the techniques of assemblage (blending) and viticulture, despite the persistent myth that anoints him as the inventor of sparkling winemaking. As cellar master at the Abbey of Hautvillers from 1668 until his death in 1715, Pérignon struggled with the problem of natural refermentation. The irrepressibly cold winters of the region created a danger: as the weather cooled off in the autumn and the yeasts became dormant, fermentation would sometimes prematurely stop, and the wines
Comments
Anonymous
Parents
  • What year would be less likely to be bottled as a vintage between 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003? From my research 2003 was one of the worst years due to the summer heatwave but that answer was wrong for the intermediate quiz. Could someone explain it to me please ? 

Comment
  • What year would be less likely to be bottled as a vintage between 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003? From my research 2003 was one of the worst years due to the summer heatwave but that answer was wrong for the intermediate quiz. Could someone explain it to me please ? 

Children
  • thank you that was very helpful 

  • 2001 was as Jancis Robinson describes "A generally poor vintage".  Wet weather at harvest meant that very little if any vintage wine was made and it was pretty universally a lousy vintage.  2003 was problematic, and certainly not as good as 2002 or 2004, but even in a hot, early vintage some decent wine was made.  I've seen quite a few 2003s in the market, including tete de cuvées like Dom Perignon.