Hey Keith! This 85% requirement is specific to earning Costa/Entre Cordilleras/Andes designation. I'll be sure to add specificity to the text to avoid confusion.
The section on Chile’s DO system includes the following text: ‘Every viticultural area within Chile’s DO scheme is now grouped under one of these three sectors, and producers may append a denominación with one of these complementary indications, provided a minimum 85% of grapes are sourced from the named region.’ But that 85% minimum would seem to conflict with the text further above that states that ‘Wines indicating an origin need only contain a minimum 75% of grapes harvested in the stated region’. I understand what happens in practice differs due to concerns over exporting to the EU, but the wording here would suggest that the 85% minimum is a legal minimum for origin labeling. Am I missing something?
Hey Juan! Thank you. The guide is updated.
Hi, in the Valle del Bío-Bío DO section it says this: “South of the Itata Valley and due west from Concepcíon” but it should be east
Hey Juan! Thank you for catching this. The guide is updated.
In Valle del Limari, the winemaker Marcelo Papa is the winemaker for "Casillero del Diablo" not "Castello del Diablo"
Hey Elizabeth! The requirement for VIGNO is confirmed as 85%. On the VIGNO association website, it states "In order to carry the word VIGNO on a label, the wine must be made 85% with Carignan and the remaining percentage is at the discretion of the winemaker or the vineyard." That being said, when VIGNO was founded in 2011, it was 65%, and Wines of South America (Goldstein) was published in 2014. Over the years it looks like they have increased the minimum amount of Carignan from 65% to 85%.
I am finding conflicting information regarding the % of Carignan in VIGNO. Some sources (Wines of South America, Goldstein) say 65% Carignan. This study guide above (and some other pages) state 85%. Can this be confirmed so I can relax? Thanks in advance... :)
In its corresponding section header above, 'Valle de Cachapoal DO' should read 'Valle del Cachapoal DO'.
It says that Pais cannot appear on a Chilean DO label, but I have witnessed it happened. Any inputs on this topic?