Hi, in the Valle del Bío-Bío DO section it says this: “South of the Itata Valley and due west from Concepcíon” but it should be east
Hey Juan! Thank you for catching this. The guide is updated.
In Valle del Limari, the winemaker Marcelo Papa is the winemaker for "Casillero del Diablo" not "Castello del Diablo"
Hey Elizabeth! The requirement for VIGNO is confirmed as 85%. On the VIGNO association website, it states "In order to carry the word VIGNO on a label, the wine must be made 85% with Carignan and the remaining percentage is at the discretion of the winemaker or the vineyard." That being said, when VIGNO was founded in 2011, it was 65%, and Wines of South America (Goldstein) was published in 2014. Over the years it looks like they have increased the minimum amount of Carignan from 65% to 85%.
I am finding conflicting information regarding the % of Carignan in VIGNO. Some sources (Wines of South America, Goldstein) say 65% Carignan. This study guide above (and some other pages) state 85%. Can this be confirmed so I can relax? Thanks in advance... :)
In its corresponding section header above, 'Valle de Cachapoal DO' should read 'Valle del Cachapoal DO'.
It says that Pais cannot appear on a Chilean DO label, but I have witnessed it happened. Any inputs on this topic?
In case anyone wants to dive a bit deeper into Chile, my book on South American wine has just been published: https://southamericawineguide.com/book Free study maps are also available on the website to download.
That's the minimum, but in practice most of the vineyards are much older... a handful being planted in 1910. The vineyards are all uploaded on the South America Old Vine Register here https://southamericawineguide.com/old-vines-of-south-america-old-vine-register-the-heroic-growers-of-south-america/
A note, the VIGNO website says vine age is min 30 years. www.vigno.org/.../