In Valle del Limari, the winemaker Marcelo Papa is the winemaker for "Casillero del Diablo" not "Castello del Diablo"
Hey Elizabeth! The requirement for VIGNO is confirmed as 85%. On the VIGNO association website, it states "In order to carry the word VIGNO on a label, the wine must be made 85% with Carignan and the remaining percentage is at the discretion of the winemaker or the vineyard." That being said, when VIGNO was founded in 2011, it was 65%, and Wines of South America (Goldstein) was published in 2014. Over the years it looks like they have increased the minimum amount of Carignan from 65% to 85%.
I am finding conflicting information regarding the % of Carignan in VIGNO. Some sources (Wines of South America, Goldstein) say 65% Carignan. This study guide above (and some other pages) state 85%. Can this be confirmed so I can relax? Thanks in advance... :)
In its corresponding section header above, 'Valle de Cachapoal DO' should read 'Valle del Cachapoal DO'.
It says that Pais cannot appear on a Chilean DO label, but I have witnessed it happened. Any inputs on this topic?
In case anyone wants to dive a bit deeper into Chile, my book on South American wine has just been published: https://southamericawineguide.com/book Free study maps are also available on the website to download.
That's the minimum, but in practice most of the vineyards are much older... a handful being planted in 1910. The vineyards are all uploaded on the South America Old Vine Register here https://southamericawineguide.com/old-vines-of-south-america-old-vine-register-the-heroic-growers-of-south-america/
A note, the VIGNO website says vine age is min 30 years. www.vigno.org/.../
Thank you!
Colchagua section needs an update--states that Apalta is still unofficial even though it gained DO status in 2018.